<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New AdWords Advertisers: Don&#8217;t be fooled by Google&#8217;s recommended settings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samgipson.co.uk/ppc/new-adwords-advertisers-dont-be-fooled-by-googles-recommended-settings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samgipson.co.uk/ppc/new-adwords-advertisers-dont-be-fooled-by-googles-recommended-settings/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:18:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: samgipson</title>
		<link>http://www.samgipson.co.uk/ppc/new-adwords-advertisers-dont-be-fooled-by-googles-recommended-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>samgipson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samgipson.co.uk/?p=20#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg, it&#039;s interesting that you switch off search partners for new campaigns. I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve ever tested this either but to be totally honest it&#039;s always performed very well for my campaigns. I suppose if the CTR was significantly lower I might consider turning this off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg, it&#8217;s interesting that you switch off search partners for new campaigns. I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve ever tested this either but to be totally honest it&#8217;s always performed very well for my campaigns. I suppose if the CTR was significantly lower I might consider turning this off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.samgipson.co.uk/ppc/new-adwords-advertisers-dont-be-fooled-by-googles-recommended-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 09:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samgipson.co.uk/?p=20#comment-11</guid>
		<description>A very valid point, Sam. Certainly one that I see a lot of less experienced clients &#039;falling for&#039;. I think the real problem for a lot of novice and intermediate users, is that the Content Network tagetting settings in AdWords make it easy to appear on a lot of less-relevant sites if you don&#039;t dig into the settings a bit. 

The other point that is worth taking into account is that a Content Network campaign will often perform very differently to a campaign on just the search or search and partner network - It isn&#039;t always possible or sensible to apply the same optimisation techniques and learnings on the Content network that may have worked effectively on the Search network.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very valid point, Sam. Certainly one that I see a lot of less experienced clients &#8216;falling for&#8217;. I think the real problem for a lot of novice and intermediate users, is that the Content Network tagetting settings in AdWords make it easy to appear on a lot of less-relevant sites if you don&#8217;t dig into the settings a bit. </p>
<p>The other point that is worth taking into account is that a Content Network campaign will often perform very differently to a campaign on just the search or search and partner network &#8211; It isn&#8217;t always possible or sensible to apply the same optimisation techniques and learnings on the Content network that may have worked effectively on the Search network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Findley</title>
		<link>http://www.samgipson.co.uk/ppc/new-adwords-advertisers-dont-be-fooled-by-googles-recommended-settings/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Findley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samgipson.co.uk/?p=20#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Good tip Sam, I always tend to go with just Google search for new campaigns before branching out to the content network. 

I always untick &#039;Search Partners&#039; on new campaigns too, as that&#039;s the Google powered search on other sites isn&#039;t it? Figured it would push the CTR down as people are more likely to be looking for specific pages/content on the site they&#039;ve searched on, rather than looking at the served ads? Can&#039;t say as though I&#039;ve experimented with that theory though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good tip Sam, I always tend to go with just Google search for new campaigns before branching out to the content network. </p>
<p>I always untick &#8216;Search Partners&#8217; on new campaigns too, as that&#8217;s the Google powered search on other sites isn&#8217;t it? Figured it would push the CTR down as people are more likely to be looking for specific pages/content on the site they&#8217;ve searched on, rather than looking at the served ads? Can&#8217;t say as though I&#8217;ve experimented with that theory though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

